American Aging Association Newsletter

MAY 2006

   review this online at www.americanaging.org/news/may06.html

Email us

2006 Annual Meeting

Discussion

Announcements

- Final Program

- Getting there...

- Supercentenarian Research Foundation meeting

- Sponsorship/Exhibit

- Our Supporters

We continue our discussion series initiated last year with PGC-1, Calorie Restriction and Aging.  As always, we welcome your comments - these will be printed in subsequent issues of our Newsletter. 

35th AGE ANNUAL MEETING - June 2-5, 2006

FINAL MEETING PROGRAM

Click in the box to the right for our final program.  The online registration has closed but you may still register onsite (to download a registration form that you can submit upon your arrival at the registration desk, click here).

 

GETTING THERE...

The pre-meeting symposium of June 2 will be held at the Jean Mayer USDA-HNRCA at Tufts University, located at 711 Washington Avenue, Boston, MA.  The AGE registration and welcome reception held later that afternoon will be held at the Marriott Tremont Hotel (click here to download additional directions and parking information).  The sessions starting the 3rd of June will be held at the Jean Mayer USDA-HNRCA at Tufts University.  For complete details, please review the final program (on the website or see above section for a downloadable version).

 

For more information about and directions to the Courtyard Marriott Tremont, click here.

For more information about and directions to the Wyndham Boston, click here.

 

Supercentenarian Research Foundation (SRF)

The first annual meeting of the Supercentenarian Research Foundation (SRF) will be held during the AGE Conference on Sun., June 4, at 8:00 PM (Conference Room on the 9th floor of the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging (HNRCA) at Tufts University).

We will describe the present status of the SRF and our development plans.  The results of autopsies of supercentenarians will be described.  Considerations for determining the genetic components of longevity will be addressed during which audience participation will be sought.  This will be a working session in which Project Proposals that have been submitted and that are needed for our Research Plan will be discussed.

We look forward to seeing you in Boston for a productive meeting.  Please see our website at www.Supercentenarian-Research-Foundation.org for more information about the SRF.

Stanley R. Primmer

Supercentenarian Research Foundation

back

EXHIBIT/SPONSORSHIP

The 35th American Aging Association Annual Meeting offers great opportunities to expand your company's visibility among the registrants by becoming an exhibitor and/or conference sponsor.   These will include multiple opportunities to:

- introduce and discuss your products and services with leading basic science researchers and clinicians of the aging field

- reach decision makers within a group-setting

- open door to new leads and long-term business relationships

- increase exposure and strengthen brand recognition in the aging research field.

Attendees include many decision makers, such as academic department chairs, heads of laboratories, government officials, attending clinicians, private practitioners, post-docs, MD and PhD students and technicians. You will be hard pressed to find a more appropriate audience for your latest products and services.  

Consider becoming a sponsor today and take advantage of extensive advertising opportunities via our newsletter and website!

back

OUR SUPPORTERS

The 35th American Aging Association Annual Meeting Organizers are most grateful for the support of the following organizations:

P L A T I N U M   S P O N S O R S

GOLD SPONSORS

SILVER SPONSORS

Bronze Sponsors:

SCHOLARSHIP SPONSORS:

AWARD SPONSORS:

CLICK HERE to read more on our supporters.

back

DISCUSSION

We continue our discussion series (initiated last year) with PGC-1, Calorie Restriction and Aging.  As always, we welcome your written comments - these will be printed in subsequent issues of our Newsletter.  Our many thanks to Dr. Norm Wolf for editing this newsletter segment.

PGC-1, Calorie Restriction and Aging

Holly M. Brown-Borg University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences and J. Christopher Corton National Health and Environmental Effects Research Lab

US Environmental Protection Agency

Transcription regulating factors have received a fair amount of attention in the last few years as we continue to search for mediators of the aging process.  The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor g coactivator 1 (PGC-1) is a family of transcriptional coactivator proteins involved in nutrient transport and metabolism, xenobiotic metabolism and stress resistance.  The roles of PGC-1 in aging and longevity are just beginning to emerge as the nuclear hormone receptor (NR) field develops and our understanding of molecular regulatory mechanisms grows. Obvious connections of PGC-1 to current research interests in aging include calorie restriction, oxidative stress, stress resistance, energy metabolism, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)/insulin signaling and longevity to name a few.  For the purposes of this discussion however, the focus will be the role of PGC-1, affected nuclear receptors (PPAR, RXR, CAR) and calorie restriction (CR) in aging.

Like other coactivators, proteins in the PGC-1 family modulate transcription by bridging interactions between DNA binding transcription factors and the transcriptional machinery in the absence of direct interaction themselves.  Activation of nuclear receptors by PGC-1 can be ligand-dependent or –independent, both of which result in increased transcription initiation of target genes.  Members of the PGC-1 family, PGC-1a and PGC-1b, share homology within certain regions of their protein sequences that relates to their coactivator function.  Differences in structure and sequence affect their interactions with nuclear receptors.  Many of these structural domains are evolutionarily conserved suggesting that PGC-1 plays an important role in overall transcriptional regulation.

PGC-1 regulates several nuclear receptors that are critical modulators of physiological processes.  There are four classes of NR, although most of those regulated by PGC-1 and known to be involved in responses to nutrient deprivation belong to class II (including constitutive activated receptor (CAR), farnesoid X receptor (FXR), liver X receptor (LXR), peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor (PPAR), pregnane X receptor (PXR), retinoid X receptor (RXR), thyroid hormone receptor, vitamin D receptor) family members that heterodimerize to RXR.  PGC-1 also interacts with ERRa, glucocorticoid receptor, HNF-4a, and the estrogen receptor. 

Several investigators have suggested that PGC-1 may be a master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis and function thus, playing a central role in energy homeostasis.  Many of the NR regulated by PGC-1a are altered following CR and affect expression of genes involved in energy utilization and stress responses.  PGC-1a is regulated by hormones that respond to alterations in glucose concentrations and environmental stimuli. For example, insulin negatively regulates gluconeogenesis and fatty acid b-oxidation at least in part via suppression of PGC-1a promoter activity.  PGC-1a and PGC-1b gene expression is induced by fasting and CR, coordinately regulating genes involved in gluconeogenesis and fatty acid b-oxidation.  PGC-1a promoter activity is also activated by glucagons, thus increasing PGC-1a expression.  In addition, many peroxisome proliferator-inducible genes are regulated by GH in part via Stat5b and PPARa interactions.

Several other factors affect PGC-1 expression and activity in tissues.  Calorie restriction and fasting lead to low insulin and increased PGC-1 a expression in liver.  Exercise also increases PGC-1a expression via activation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV and calcineurin and via MAPK pathways.  Inactivation of insulin receptor increases PGC-1a expression while chronic activation of Akt in mouse heart decreases PGC-1a expression.  Conditions that induce mitochondrial biogenesis such as nitric oxide increase PGC-1a promoter activity.  PGC-1a activity may also be regulated post-transcriptionally by three types of modifications: 1) p38 MAPK phosphorylation which increases activation of fatty acid b-oxidation genes; 2) arginine methylation by protein arginine methyltransferase (another NR coactivator) which facilitates activation of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis; and 3) acetylation which alters the expression of gluconeogenic and glycolytic genes.

Much of what is known about PGC-1, nuclear receptors and CR involves PPARa.  PPARa is activated by peroxisome proliferators including hypolipidemic agents and several compounds found endogenously (e.g., fatty acids or dietary components (pristanic acid, phytanic acid, resveratol, oleylethanolamine)).  PPARa is involved in carbon source utilization.  PPARa is upregulated in several tissues by fasting and CR and downregulated in pancreatic b-cells by glucose.  PPARa-null mice exhibit defects in the ability to regulate genes involved in fatty acid b-oxidation and ketogenesis in parallel with difficulty maintaining proper levels of blood glucose and ketone bodies.  PPARa activation has been shown to regulate a subset of CR-responsive genes in the liver involved in fatty acid metabolism, inflammation and cell growth.  In addition, like CR, PPARa regulates responses to diverse forms of stress.  Exposure to PPARa-agonists decreases cellular damage, increases tissue repair and decreases mortality following both physical and chemical stressors.

Another nuclear receptor regulated by PGC-1 that is likely involved in the beneficial effects of CR is CAR.  CAR regulates phase I, phase II and phase III pathways of oxidative metabolism, conjugation and transport of xenobiotics.  This receptor exhibits constitutive activity but can also be further activated by exogenous compounds.  CAR controls genes involved in thyroid hormone metabolism induced by fasting and there is evidence that CAR controls xenobiotic metabolism genes that regulate thyroid hormone levels during CR.  Although this discussion is limited to mammalian aging, it is of particular signficance that long-living C. elegans daf-2 mutants exhibit enhanced xenobiotic metabolism similar to rodents subjected to CR suggesting a common pathway involved in stress resistance and longevity.

The molecular mechanisms that underlie the beneficial effects of CR are not well understood.  However, several laboratories have focused efforts on the insulin/IGF-1 pathway as the physiological effects of CR in rodents appear to overlap with the effects of reduced signaling through this pathway.  Calorie restriction decreases plasma concentrations of growth hormone, IGF-1, insulin and glucose, thus reducing signaling, enhancing insulin sensitivity and extending life span.  Reductions in GH, IGF-1and/or insulin signaling via engineered or spontaneous mutations significantly extend life span in multiple species.  Some of the expression overlap between dwarf and CR phenotypes in liver is found in genes that are regulated by PGC-1.  Comparison of survival plot slopes between long living mice with underlying defects in GH/IGF-1 signaling and those subjected to CR reveal differently shaped curves suggesting more of a delayed aging in mutant mice versus a decelerated aging in CR mice. In addition, genes regulating fatty acid b-oxidation and fat metabolism are closely linked to insulin action.  Therefore, the PGC-1-regulated genes, specifically through PPAR and RXR, are likely at the heart of this issue. 

Several papers published in the past year shed some light on the GH-IGF-1-insulin relationship with calorie restriction, the role of the PPARs and aging. First, the Corton laboratory demonstrated that some of the long-living dwarf mice constitutively express several PPARa-regulated genes.  To understand the phenotypic similarities between dwarf mice (Snell) and peroxisome-proliferator (PP)-treated wild type mice, the transcriptional profiles under these two conditions were compared and revealed a significant overlap (40%) in gene expression.  Genes with known roles in fatty acid metabolism that were induced by PP treatment of wild type mice were found to be constitutively upregulated in dwarf mice including Acox1, Cyp4a10, Cyp4a14, Dci, Fabp4, Ech1, Ehhadh.  Expression of gene products regulated by PP in a PPARa-dependent manner were also examined in liver tissues.  Protein levels of ACO, a rate limiting enzyme in fatty acid b-oxidation pathway, and Cyp4a were higher in untreated dwarf mice and PP-treated wild type mice compared to untreated wild type mice.  In addition, PPARa mRNA and protein levels were constitutively upregulated in dwarf mice likely contributing to the observed increased expression of PPARa gene targets.  ACO and Cyp4a were also upregulated in Ames dwarfs while Cyp4a was increased in GHR-KO mice when compared to corresponding wild type mice.  Differences in the expression of genes and proteins involved in protein folding (chaperonins, chaperones) and cardiovascular disease were also observed in dwarf mice.  Overall, the results indicated that some of the beneficial effects associated with the dwarf phenotype are likely due to the constitutive activation of PPARa and PPARa-regulated genes. 

A second body of evidence has been contributed by Andrzej Bartke’s laboratory.  These investigators have systematically evaluated PPAR expression levels in several tissues of calorie-restricted and ad libitum fed growth hormone receptor/binding protein knock out (GHR-KO) and wild type mice.  The GHR-KO mice exhibit GH resistance, reduced plasma IGF-1, enhanced insulin sensitivity and a 40% increase in life span.  Liver PPARa and PPARg mRNA and protein levels were elevated as were retinoid X receptor (RXR) mRNA levels in GHR-KO mice compared to wild type mice.  Calorie restriction further enhanced PPARa expression in the GHR-KO mice.  Differences in PPAR actions due to altered expression levels likely contribute to the enhanced insulin sensitivity of GHR-KO mice. Tissue specific differences were identified when skeletal muscle was examined, another target tissue of insulin.  PPARg and PPARa protein levels were reduced in KO muscle while mRNA levels did not differ from wild type mice.  However, CR reduced PPARa and PPARg mRNA and PPARa protein in both KO and wild type mice.  Muscle RXR gene expression followed a pattern similar to PPAR.  In heart tissue, the expression of PPARa and PPARg did not differ between genotypes but CR increased PPARa expression in GHR-KO mice.  These data suggest that the role of PPARs in fatty acid metabolism and the response to CR is tissue-specific and dependent upon appropriate growth factor signaling. 

An additional piece of the puzzle was recently provided by work also from the Bartke lab (PNAS, 2006).  They demonstrated that CR does not extend lifespan in animals exhibiting GH-resistance (GHR-KO) suggesting that the GH receptor or GH receptor-dependent signaling pathway is required for CR’s longevity benefits in mammals.  The lack of a life extension benefit of CR in GHR-KO mice was associated with a failure of CR to further increase insulin sensitivity in these mice. 

Although both GHR-KO and Ames (or Snell) dwarfs are long-living and both exhibit reduced IGF-1/insulin signaling, differences between GHR-KO mice and these dwarf mice exist.  Dwarf mice subjected to CR live longer than ad libitum fed dwarf mice.  In addition, it was shown that the Ames mutation and CR affect a number of overlapping genes and that additive effects of the dwarf mutation and CR on life span arise from additive effects on the level of expression of some genes and their independent effects on other genes.  Genes included in this category that were under control of PGC-1 include CAR, PXR and PPARa.  And, while Ames dwarf mice have reduced cholesterol, triglyceride and free fatty acid levels, GHR-KO mice only exhibit a significant reduction in total plasma cholesterol compared to wild type control mice.  Calorie restriction raised FFA in plasma and muscle of wild type and KO mice while lowering triglycerides in both plasma and muscle.  Cholesterol was reduced in wild type mice following CR, a finding consistent with previous studies of calorie restriction.  In addition, dwarf mice lack prolactin (GHR-KO – high prolactin) and thyroid hormone levels are lower leading to differences in reproductive ability, body composition, oxidative stress resistance and end-of-life pathology between these two mutant strains. 

Given the role of PPARa in mediating transcriptional responses of CR, PGC-1-regulated PPARa may be one common pathway that operates in dwarf mutants and mice subjected to CR.  Several questions come to mind regarding the role of PGC-1, downstream nuclear receptor activation, calorie restriction and the growth factor signaling pathways. Will the beneficial actions of calorie restriction ultimately be linked to an active GH receptor in other mouse strains/mammals? What is the role of growth hormone?  In C. elegans some of the life extending mutations appear to be acting through mechanisms similar to CR but expression of insulin-like pathways genes are not related.  In contrast, evidence in Drosophila demonstrates great similarities between genes activated by CR and those in the insulin-like pathway.  Regarding species other than mammals, will the life extending benefit of calorie restriction be an underlying theme connected to a functional growth factor pathway? Does the type of restriction applied (every other day feeding, protein restriction, methionine restriction) make a difference regarding PGC-1 and nuclear hormone activation?  Does CR represent a stressor, thus upregulating a variety of defense pathways via PGC-1?  Is there cross-species conservation of the age-dependent declines in PGC-1-regulated genes?  Is the upregulation of PPARa primarily for increasing energy production needed for tissue repair, optimal expression of repair genes or increased protective mechanisms? 

Generation and utilization of a number of nuclear receptor mutants in combination with calorie restriction will address many of these questions.  A clearer understanding of CR will effectively aid in the search for pharmacological agents or lifestyle changes that may slow aging and/or attenuate development or progression of age-related disease.  Exploitation of nuclear hormone receptor pharmacology in the design of CR mimetics may be fertile ground in the search for mediators of the aging process.

back

ANNOUNCEMENTS

WELCOME TO OUR NEW AGE MEMBERS:

Fernando Antonio Almeida, Institute of Endocrinology, Brazil

Murat Dogru, Keio University School of Medicine, Japan

Gunther Kletetschka, NASA, USA

Kevin Perrott, University of Alberta, Canada

Takahiko Shimizu, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Japan

Dave Rollo, McMaster University, Canada

David Stern, CR Society, USA

Welcome to all!

back

MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS:

Have a conference you want us to feature?  Tell us about it.t.

 

Aug 17 - 19, 2006

The Ellison Medical Foundation Colloquium on the Biology of Aging

(click here for details)

 

September 4-5, 2006
Aging Research in Immunology: the Impact of Genomics (ARIG) Symposium

Paris, France

www.arig.ac.at
 

November 16-20, 2006

The Gerontological Society of America's 59th Annual Scientific Meeting
Education & The Gerontological Imagination
www.agingconference.com/about_the_meeting.cfm

 

back

IN MEMORIAM

VINCENT J. CRISTOFALO, PhD

1933 -  2006

Vincent J. Cristofalo died on May 8, 2006; he was 73.  During his more than four decades of research in cell and molecular biology he produced 138 peer-reviewed papers, 109 reviews, edited 15 books, and published 161 abstracts. Additionally, he was series editor for 6 publications.  He was a Professor at the Wistar Institute and the University of Pennsylvania for many years.  After retiring, he moved to Alleghany University to found the Center for Gerontological Research, he also served as the Vice-Provost of that Institution from 1994 - 1999.  In 1999, he became President and CEO of the Lankenau Institute for Medical Research (Wynnewood, PA).  He was also appointed a Professor of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology by Thomas Jefferson University in 2000.  The recipient of many grants and awards, he was the Principal Investigator on the longest running program project grant in NIA history.  He was well traveled and presented scholarly work to many different scientific organizations.  Additionally, he was President of the Gerontological Society of America in 1990 and President of the American Federation for Aging Research (1996-1998). He was a member of numerous editorial boards for a variety of Gerontology journals and was the editor of "The Journals of Gerontology: Biological Sciences" from 1988-1991.

Throughout his career, Dr. Cristofalo examined many aspects of human cell growth and immortalization. Perhaps, most famously, he extensively analyzed the cessation of growth that occurs in cultures of non-cancer cells that are maintained under conditions that promote continuous growth.  This limit in the capacity of cell cultures to divide has frequently been compared to aging in intact organisms.  Cristofalo explored many aspects of this phenomenon at all levels of cellular organization.   He studied the effects of oxygen, antioxidants and growth factors on replicative capacity and posed questions about the genetics and evolutionary involvement in aging. He examined the stability of various cellular components in young and aged cells and identified many of the changes that occur during proliferative senescence.  Much of the work that described both genetic and stochastic aspects of cellular senescence was pioneered in his laboratory.

In 1998, he and others published what was possibly his most controversial work entitled "Relationship Between Donor Age and the Replicative Life Span of Human Cells in Culture." In it, they presented results that demonstrated that cells from elderly people did not necessarily exhibit diminished proliferative capacity as compared with cells of young people. This paper, published in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and several subsequent works challenged not only a fundamental tenet of the cellular senescence model but also redefined cellular senescence on the basis of whether it occurred in organisms or under culture conditions as two distinct phenomena.  In another pivotal work, he discovered that the b-gal assay commonly used as a specific marker to link cell senescence with aging in vivo was not actually specific to senescent cells and can even be detected in cultures of cancer cells that become confluent or that are treated with oxidants. During the final years of his career he examined changes in gene expression of regulatory mechanisms that contributed to senescence.  He also collaborated on a project that examined telomere length and proliferative capacity in a cloned cow.  Of course, his greatest legacy is the dozens of students and post-docs that studied in his lab and who continue to contribute to understanding the phenomenon of aging. 

 back

JOURNAL

AGE's 27.4 is now published and available to all AGE members!  Click here: www.springerlink.com/link.asp?id=tx8181235g35

AGE's 27.2 is still freely available to everyone!  Click here to access it.
 

If you are not an AGE member, become a member today and get access to ALL AGE issues!

For journal updates, please bookmark the Association's
homepage or visit the Springer site at www.springeronline.com/11357

back

CLICK HERE TO DONATE $35 OR MORE FOR 35 OF AGE'S SUCCESSFUL YEARS!!

BECOME A MEMBER OR RENEW YOUR MEMBERSHIP TODAY AT:

If you feel that this information has reached you in error, or simply are no longer interested in receiving our monthly announcements, please click on the unsubscribe link below. We also welcome any recommendations that you may have to insure our communications with you meet your expectations. Please email ameraging@aol.com with your recommendations.
To unsubscribe, send us a message to
ameraging@aol.com.

back

   © AGE 2005-6